One of my hobbies is collecting antique books about adventure and exploration, with stories of survival among my favorites. Startup entrepreneurs can often be compared to these survivors, helping to get their businesses through whatever hazards that get in their way. I pulled the below list of survival stories from my collection for your reading enjoyment, for any of you startups that may be staring over the edge of the abyss and need some additional inspiration to help weather the storm.
SURVIVING THE ICE
"Endurance-Shackleton's Incredible Voyage" by Alfred Lansing. After their ship is crushed in the ice in 1915, Ernest Shackleton and his crew survive over a year stranded in Antarctica, on ice and sea.
"The Worst Journey in the World" by Apsley Cherry Garrard. A scientific expedition to Antarctica in 1910 goes distastrously wrong.
"Mawson's Will" by Lennard Bickel. One of the most incredible solo journeys ever, as Douglas Mawson survives brutal conditions in mapping Antarctica's coastline in 1912.
"Four Against the Arctic" by David Roberts. Russian sailors shipwrecked for six years at the top of the world in 1743.
"Two Years Amongst the Ice" by Otto Nordenskjold. The first-hand account of survival of a Swedish expedition shipwrecked in the Antarctic Peninsula in 1901.
"Trial by Ice" by Richard Parry. The true story of murder and survival on the 1871 Polaris expedition, in one of America's attempts to get to the North Pole.
SURVIVING HIGH ALTITUDES
"Conquest of Everest" by Sir John Hunt. First-hand account of the successful first summit of Mount Everest by Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay in 1953, by the expedition head.
"K2-The Savage Mountain" by Charles Houston. A riveting read that chronicles the 1953 American attempt to summit K2, trapped in the death zone during a storm.
"Annapurna" by Maurice Herzog. The first conquest of an 8,000 meter peak, Annapurna, and the survival story thereon in 1950.
"Alive" by Piers Paul Rand. The survival story of the Uruguayan rugby team stranded for 10 weeks in the Andes high peaks after their plane crashes in 1972.
"Touching the Void" by Joe Simpson. The true-story of one man's miraculous survival with a broken leg, after being left for dead in a cravasse when his partner "cuts the rope" after a fall in the Andes.
"Left for Dead" by Beck Weathers. First-hand account of surviving the most deadly storm on Mount Everest in 1996, after being left for dead.
SURVIVING THE SEA
"Journal--1st Voyage to America" by Christopher Columbus. The first-hand account of blindly leaving Europe in hopes of finding India in 1492.
"Adrift" by Steven Callahan. First-hand account of being lost at sea for 76 days in an inflatable raft after his small ship capsizes.
"Five Against the Sea" by Ron Arias. Stranded for 142 days at sea after a 29 foot raft runs into an unexpected storm off the coast of Costa Rica in 1988.
"Wreck of the Whaleship Essex" by Owen Chase. The inspiration for Moby Dick, the first-hand account of surviving 90 days at sea after a whale attack on their ship in 1820.
"The White Headhunter" by Nigel Randell. The story of a teenage Scots sailor who survived 2,000 miles adrift at sea, only to land on an island with headhunters in 1868.
SURVIVING THE WAR
"We Die Alone" by David Howarth. A World War II epic of escape and endurance, detailing Jan Baalsrud's escape from Nazi-occupied arctic Norway.
"The Long Walk" by Slavomir Rawicz. A Polish army officer escapes from a German labor camp in Yakutsk in 1940, and travels across thousands of miles on foot to freedom in British India.
"No Picnic on Mount Keyna" by Felice Benuzzi. Three Italian compratiots escape a British POW camp in East Africa in 1943, with the simple goal of summiting Mount Kenya.
SURVIVING AFRICA
"Sufferings in Africa" by James Riley. The amazing true story of an Irish-American sailor enslaved in the deserts of North Africa, after being shipwrecked in 1815 off the coast of Morocco.
"The Man-Eaters of Tsavo" by John Henry Patterson. Desert heat, fever-ridden jungles and man-eating lions cannot stop the British from laying 580 miles of train rails across East Africa.
SURVIVING THE JOURNEY
"Undaunted Courage" by Stephen Ambrose. The story of Lewis & Clark and their search for a waterway to the Pacific Ocean.
"Spirit of St. Louis" by Charles Lindbergh. The first-hand story of the perilous first trans-Atlantic flight in a single engine plane by Charles Lindbergh in 1927.
"Lost Moon" by Jim Lovell. The first-hand account of the perilous survival story of the crew of Apollo 13 which had to abort their mission to the moon.
SURVIVAL ANTHOLOGIES
"Survivors" by John Letterman. Extraordinary collection of stories about human endurance, resourcefulness, courage and luck--in perilous circumstances and against greatest odds.
All of the above titles are linked to their matching page at Amazon.com for your convenience. If you think I am missing any good stories, add them in the comments field below. Happy reading!
For future posts, please follow me at: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb
Monday, March 25, 2013
Monday, March 18, 2013
Lesson #138: Why VC's Bias Technology Startups
I have had hundreds of startups reach out to me at Red Rocket looking for fund raising assistance. Most with hungry, passionate entrepreneurs trying to build a great company in their space. But, it is typically the technology startups that get through the filter of what I think is "fundable" by professional venture capitalists, based on my conversations with those investors. Which leaves many of the startups in other categories (e.g., CPG, retail, restaurants, real estate, manufacturing) struggling to secure startup capital. Today's lesson is going to address why that is the case.
RISK LARGELY LIMITED TO EXECUTION
Technology startups typically have normal business/execution risks that VC's are willing to take, especially after they have flushed out the concept seeing a material proof of concept already acheived before investing their capital. But, think about other startups. Restaurants and retailers have the additional risk of real estate locations (e.g., what happens if the road you are located on goes under construction). They also have the additional inventory obsolence risk (e.g., what happens if you pick the wrong products to sell). So, instead of taking on multiple types of risk (e.g., execution, real estate, inventory), the VC will typically take the other risks off the table, and focus on technology startups where the risks are much reduced.
LOW UPFRONT CAPITAL REQUIRED
The cost of building a technology startup has dramatically reduced over the last decade. No longer do you need to pay for hardware, or code commonly-used tools, or pay for big support teams. Websites today are hosted in the cloud and use open source software, taking the cost of the build-out down from the millions a decade ago to the hundreds of thousands today. Compare that to the multi-million dollars of capital required to launch a new big box retailer or manufacturing facility or real estate development. Or, the additional capital required to fund all the inventory that goes therein. Or, the additional financial burden of a long term real estate lease if the business fails. The VC's mentality is why invest big money upfront (or over time if things turn south), when you can invest little money in a tech business, for the same big upside returns.
FEWER EMPLOYEES, EASIER TO SCALE
VC's just don't like startups that are human supported businesses out of the gate. People cost money, people are hard to recruit, human-driven businesses are just less scalable than a simple software-as-a-service business, as an example. Why invest in a 25% gross margin business, when you can invest in a 90% gross margin business, is the mentality, when you can flow thru all those extra dollars to the bottom line. Human driven businesses typically attract investor attention later in their development cycle, when private equity firms start to take notice, which have different investment objectives.
HIGH UPSIDE & ROI POTENTIAL
What was the last non-tech company to go public at a valuation of 10x revenues?? Most other industries are valued with much more conservative EBITDA or net income based metrics. Compare that to a hot technology startup, which is quickly acquiring global users, is given a free pass on the bottom line, to build up a dominant market position (with a "we'll optimize the revenue model later, once the audience is built" mentality of many of the Silicon Valley venture firms). So, if tech companies average 2x-3x revenues for their valuation, instead of 4x-8x EBITDA for their valuation, and they are given a pass on driving short term profitability, you can better understand the venture firms' natural draw to tech companies.
Hopefully, you now have a better understanding to why VC's bias tech startups. Which means one of following two things for you: (i) focus on launching tech startups to have a maximum odds of raising venture capital; or (ii) understand going in, that most non-tech startups will need to be financed in other ways, which may or may not be easy for you.
For future posts, please follow me at: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb
Monday, March 11, 2013
[NEWS] Red Rocket Featured On Tasty Trade!!
This morning, I had the pleasure of being interviewed by Tom Sosnoff and Tony Battista at TastyTrade, for their online "Bootstrapping in America" show about startups. Here is the video:
If you haven't seen the show, it is really terrific. Tom and Tony have interviewed some of Chicago's best entrepreneurs who have shared their stories. Here is a link to the TastyTrade channel on YouTube, to see their other "Bootstrapping in America" interviews.
For future posts, please follow me at: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb
If you haven't seen the show, it is really terrific. Tom and Tony have interviewed some of Chicago's best entrepreneurs who have shared their stories. Here is a link to the TastyTrade channel on YouTube, to see their other "Bootstrapping in America" interviews.
For future posts, please follow me at: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb
Lesson #137: The Basic Drivers of E-commerce Growth
I put this list of core e-commerce growth drivers together for a project I am working on, and I thought it would be useful for all of you who are building e-commerce companies. Follow this playbook in designing your e-commerce growth strategies, and stay on top of key trends over time.
MAKE SURE YOUR E-COMMERCE EFFORTS ARE IN SYNC WITH CORPORATE GOALS
·
Have a clear understanding of
company’s overall growth objectives.
·
Have a clear understanding of
company’s branding and marketing objectives.
·
Have a clear understanding of
company’s target customers & demographics.
·
Have a clear understanding of
company’s products/margins – which product sales move the bottom line needle
the most.
·
Have a clear understanding of company’s
financial targets (revenues, margins, ROI).
OMNI-CHANNEL DESIGN/CUSTOMER OF ONE
·
You are not building a website in
isolation from other customer channels—break down divisional silos.
·
All decisions should be made with
a customer-centric mindset.
·
Allows customers to shop where,
how and when they choose, anytime & anyplace.
·
Means integrating all website,
mobile, store, call center systems, etc.
·
Means tailoring offering and
messaging down to the person-by-person basis.
DRIVING NEW USERS TO THE SITE
· Determine the proper marketing
plan that works within your budgets.
· Bias online marketing, as most
trackable and one-click away from your site.
· Constantly test and iterate all
offers and creatives being used to maximize engagement.
· Drive traffic to specific product
landing pages, which should be unique and tested.
· Have a clear understanding of the
keywords that matter most for your business, and optimize your site for SEO and
PPC efforts.
· Cross promote e-commerce
capabilities across all channels of your business.
· Cross promote e-commerce links
across within all other channel marketing.
· Leverage the power of social media—maintain
and promote your own profile pages on major social networks (e.g., Facebook,
Twitter, Pinterest), allow for social sharing from all product pages and conversational
communications/viral marketing therefrom.
GETTING EXISTING USERS MORE ENGAGED
· Continually optimize and fine tune
the product/pricing offering to match demand.
· Maintain consistent communications
with customers, via monthly newsletters or other means.
· Create loyalty programs that
reward increased spend with increased rewards.
· Allow customers to create
wishlists that they can send to their friends and family.
· Tailor product offers to specific
customer profile data.
· Optimize upselling and
cross-selling techniques (e.g., promote related items, and “people who bought
this, also bought that” functionality).
· Use machine learning techniques to
keep a “memory” of user behaviors, in session and over time, to allow for behavioral
targeting.
· Use targeted pull back ads
after a user leaves the site without buying
· Automated repurchase reminders for
things that need to be replaced over time
· Opt customers into company
newsletters during time of e-commerce purchases.
WEBSITE DESIGN/FUNCTIONALITY
· Need a clear and simple way to
navigate the site (e.g., think “one click” away).
· Constantly test page layouts to increase
user engagement, using eye pattern heat maps, user mouse tracking or otherwise.
· Constantly test shopping cart flow
to limit abandon rates.
· Study all abandon rates to figure
out why customers ended up not buying—and address such items.
· Leverage video where you can, as
much more effective than static images and text in terms of driving engagement.
· Leverage the reviews and feedback
of other customers who bought same items.
FULFILLMENT/CUSTOMER SERVICE
· Offer two-way free shipping for
orders over a certain size (e.g., $50)—don’t give users any reason not to buy.
· Offer no-hassle customer
satisfaction guarantees for full refund if not satisfied for any reason.
· Provide clear communication on all
shipping related issues (e.g., time to ship, expected arrival dates), with
opportunities to get overnight, if needed.
· Provide ability to check inventory
online, for items available in the stores for same day pickup.
· Simple credit card processing online, and
ability to collect payment information via phone.
· Allow returns either via mail or
direct to the stores.
· Consider kiosk or tablet-based
opportunities and services within the stores.
CRM/BIG DATA
· Invest in customer CRMs as a
central repository to track all client profile, preferences, sales and social
media history behavior.
· Invest in big data analytics
technology to make sense of the fire hose of data available.
· The future of marketing is moving
towards person-by-person targeting of products, offers, messaging based on
their past behaviors and profile preferences.
It is no longer mass marketing of the same messaging to all.
· Study cross channel behaviors to
learn how customers prefer to engage with the company (e.g., researched online
but bought in the store, or vice versa).
· Test, test and retest all
marketing activities, looking to sharpen efforts with each iteration.
MOBILITY
· The PC market is actually
declining while the mobile market is exploding—you need to have native mobile
apps built for each major platform (e.g., Apple, Android) or a mobile friendly
touch site.
· Take advantage of mobile locations
of your customers, with targeted offers and services related to their exact
location (e.g., check out our new store near your location, here are local
restaurant deals to go with your recent movie tickets purchase, here is our
mobile mapping app to go with your new car).
For future posts, please follow me: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb.
Monday, March 4, 2013
Lesson #136: Save Taxes With "Profits Interests" vs. "Stock Options"
I recently read an interesting article on how startup employees with material equity stakes can materially save on their long term capital gains taxes, written by Ken Obel, a startup attorney at GoodCounsel here in Chicago. Ken was gratious enough to let me share it with all of you.
Many startups launch their companies as limited
liability companies (LLCs), enjoying the flexibility and tax-efficiency that this type
of entity offers (please re-read Lesson #56 for more details here). A lesser known, but quite
significant, advantage of LLC’s is the ability to provide incentive equity in
the form of “profits interests”, instead of the more typically seen stock option plans used for incentivizing employees. A
profits interest allows an LLC to give service providers option-like equity
without the need for these individuals to put money at risk in order to obtain
long-term capital gains tax treatment.
Consider the following example. In the traditional startup, a company issues
options to a new employee priced at the company’s then-fair market value of $1
per share. Issuance of the options has no current tax impact, however, if the
employee exercises the options when the company is later acquired at a price of
$3 per share, the gain or “spread” of $2 per share will be taxed to the
employee at short-term capital gains rates – which can be as high as 35% depending on your income.
This is because the holding period for the equity starts upon exercise of the options,
not their issuance. Wouldn’t it be better for the employee to exercise the
options and hold the underlying equity for a year, in order to receive
long-term capital gains treatment at the time of sale -- lowering their tax rate closer to 20%? Of course. But this
requires the optionholder to come out of pocket to pay the exercise price (with cash they may not have) and
to take the risk that during that year, the equity may lose its value. Few
employees will take that risk, and will instead hold the options until a
profitable exit is at hand, swallowing the significantly higher tax rate as the
price of reducing the risk.
In an LLC, a profits interest is economically
equivalent to an option. If a unit of LLC equity has a value of $1, a profits
interest issued at that moment comes with a right to participate only in those
proceeds of a liquidity event that are in excess of that dollar. (This “hurdle
amount" is the economic equivalent of an option's exercise price – both
serving to ensure that the optionholder participates only in the economic value
he or she participates in creating.) But, unlike an option, which is not
"property" (in the view of the IRS), the profits interest is
property, and therefore, the capital gains holding period begins to run upon
issuance – and the employee never has to come out of pocket with cash. In the previous
example, when the company sells for $3 per share, the profits interest holder
would receive his or her share of the proceeds beyond the $1 hurdle amount, or
$2 per unit, and (assuming at least a year had elapsed between issuance and the
sale) these proceeds would be taxed at the lower long-term capital gains rate.
What should you consider before issuing
profits interests? First, you have to be an LLC, so you have to be comfortable
that this is the right entity for you, your business and your investors (remembering most VC's will most likely require you to be a C-Corp in order for them to invest). Next,
consider that profits interests are not the easiest form of incentive equity to
explain to your employees. The typical employee understands what an option is; odds are they’ve
never heard of a profits interest. But, one view is, if their incentive
equity grant is significant, their tax savings from a profits interest stands
to be worth a great deal in long term tax savings to them – enough for them to take a few minutes to understand
how this works for their benefit.
The most significant negatives arise from the
fact that a profits interest holder in an LLC is considered an equity owner, and equity owners are ineligible to be paid as a regular W-2 employee. Instead, the company must
report all compensation on a form K-1 (relating to the partner). This has
negative ramifications regarding the employee's responsibility for
paying their own self-employment taxes and the deductibility of company contributions toward
healthcare and other benefits.
These are issues that should be discussed with
tax and legal advisors before making a decision about the proper form of
incentive equity. But, in cases where you have a material equity-owning employee, looking to acheive material long term capital gains tax savings, and is willing to deal with the "equity owner vs. employee" tax treatment along the way, this could be a good road to pursue.
Thanks, Ken, for sharing your wisdom here. If anyone has questions from here, feel free to reach out to Ken directly at 312-380-9406, or e-mail him at the GoodCounsel website.
For future posts, please follow me at: www.twitter.com/georgedeeb.