I was recently engaged by the
estate of a founder to assist in finding a new owner for their business after
the founder died. There were a lot of
valuable business lessons that came out of this process that I wanted to share
with you. Not for your estate survivors
after you die, but instead for you before you die, so you don’t repeat the same
mistakes of this other entrepreneur that failed to properly lay out a clear
legacy plan in the event of his death, leaving the survivors scrambling looking
for answers in the wake of his death.
The Business and Situation
The business here was a solo-owner
charitable foundation that runs a big annual event, an event that was run by
the founder for decades. The founder
died with no clear plan for what do with his business in the event of his death,
especially with nobody in his family wanting to pick up the reins. But everyone associated with the event wanted
the event to survive for years to come, especially to honor the legacy of the
founder. The problem was we couldn’t get
into the head of the founder to ask him who he would have liked to take over
for him. Instead, we had to come up with
candidates on our own. And that left a
big void for us to fill.
Step One: Search for Breadcrumbs Left by the Founder to
Help Guide Us
The founder had considered putting
a transition plan in place in the past, and we were fortunate to find a
few files in his office that referenced those specific partners. He even went so far as having detailed merger
discussions with two of them, the notes and draft agreement left behind in the
files. But how do we interpret
that? Yes, they are good candidates
because the founder thought they were good candidates in the past? Or, no, they are not good candidates because
they never got to the finish line for some unknown reason? We decided to pursue them, to see if there was
any interest in rekindling those old discussions.
Step Two: Speak to the Staff and Current Board of the
Business For Their Thoughts
The surviving staff had been
associated with this business for years and did offer up several specific
suggestions of potential companies to reach out to, to take over the
event. But the staff were more
execution-level in their approach and thinking, and I was looking for more of a
strategic-level list of companies where the missions of the two businesses were
perfectly in alignment with each other, to increase the odds of long-term
survival of the event.
The board was also helpful, in
that they presented themselves as a candidate to take over the event, given
their decades of history there. But that
presented a couple problems. Their
recommendation was biased for their own personal interests, and it is one thing
to be a board advisor, and another thing to be the actual event operator, and
they didn’t really have those needed operational, marketing and fundraising
skills. There was also the issue of the
event having struggled for the last couple years to grow its audience back to
historical heights, and the fear of handing the event off to the same team that
oversaw such historical declines.
Worth adding, I was curious why
only some of the board members reached out to me to express their views, and I
hadn’t heard from the others. So, I
called a few of them to seek their input, figuring they did not have a “horse
in the race” and would give me a candid opinion. Those were very telling conversations; the
board members were not in alignment with each other, with one half of the board
not really desiring the other half of the board to take over, to keep their
going forward involvement. I wasn’t
expecting that, but it certainly helped directionally find a partner that would
be embraced by most all. And in this
case, it wouldn’t be the fractured existing board.
Step Three: Figure Out Your Exact Needs and Outreach to
New Partners That Fill Those Needs
We came up with a scorecard of
everything we wanted to find in a new partner. Things like strategic fit,
financial resources, event production experience, event marketing experience,
reputation, interest in preserving the legacy of the founder, personality fit,
vision, etc. Strategic fit was the most
important and we came up with a short list of organizations that served this
same target market and reached out to each of them, interviewing each of the
interested parties for the criteria above, and ultimately selecting a winner
that “checked all the boxes” to move forward with the transition.
Step Four: Prepare for a Lot of Bruised Feelings
In this project, we had five
interested parties, but only one could win.
And one of those parties, the current board, felt they were “entitled”
to win this event given their decades of history with it. But it was clear for many reasons they lacked
the needed skills to be successful in not only running the historical event,
but growing it into something bigger and better than it had ever been in the
past, to truly honor the founder’s legacy.
When many of these board members learned they did not win this process,
the decided to entirely disengage with the event. Which is really sad. As that meant it really wasn’t about the
event, or the cause, or the founder’s legacy that was important to them; it was
simply their personal ambitions which was driving them. That confirmed we made the right decision.
The other issue to navigate
through was all the various surviving family members had differing opinions of how
the process should be run and who should ultimately win the event. And there was no way to make everyone happy,
which bruised a lot of feelings that their opinions were not being listened
to. But without the founder making his
intentions clear, and “lots of cooks in the kitchen” in the wake of his death, the
project was ripe to leave people feeling discontent.
Step Five: Hug All Legacy Partners and Make Them Still
Feel Loved to Embrace the New Partner
In addition to making room for all
the old board members to stay engaged in leadership roles with the new event
owner, there were lots of event sponsors, vendors and other partners that
needed to be communicated with and embraced to keep them involved in the
future. In this case, the event was so
tied to the founder, that there was a risk of many of the historical partners
not continuing their involvement going forward.
But with the right communication strategy, vision and outreach plan, we
were successful in getting most historical partners to continue their
involvement with the new ownership. But
in the absence of the founder giving clear direction here, to ensure his legacy
desires were communicated to all ahead of the time of his death, I think we did
a good job of filling that void.
The Moral of the Story
The survivors of the founder
should have never been in this situation in the first place, having to “guess”
what the founder would have preferred to happen to his business in the event of
his death. It is very important you
document your desired transition plan for your business somewhere. It would have been so much easier for the
survivors to simply shut down the business and move on with the rest of their
lives. But in honor of the founder’s
legacy, they put in the work to make a smooth transition happen. Hopefully, the
founder is happy with the selected outcome, but I guess we will never know for
sure. Don’t put your own survivors in this
same situation when you die.
For future posts, follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.