Latest Updates

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Lesson #385: When Making Decisions, Know Your Priorities and Never 'Force It'

Posted By: George Deeb - 11/11/2026

I have recently been looking for new site locations from my co-warehousing business, Blue Co .  What an eye opening experience that has been...


I have recently been looking for new site locations from my co-warehousing business, Blue Co.  What an eye opening experience that has been over the last couple months, rife with ups and downs and business lessons for all.  The short story is: as a startup, you only have a few opportunities to open a new location, and you have to get it right to impress your investors.  No opportunity is perfect, and you may need to make some sacrifices.  But knowing what elements are non-negotiable, could be the difference between keeping your business growing and potentially “sinking the ship”.  Allow me to explain.

What Blue Co Was Searching For?

Blue Co was on the hunt for 50,000 to 70,000 square foot buildings in major metropolitan markets of the Southeast at terms its unique co-warehousing model could afford.  The locations needed to be within the “beltways” of those major markets (e.g., under 10 miles from the city center), with nearby highway access and plenty of parking for its members.  After reviewing over 200 listings, and not a single signed lease to show for it, it became clear that this search was going to be a lot harder than expected.

What Were The Challenges?

There were so many decision points in picking a new location.  The city, the location, the property, the surrounding neighborhood and demographics, the building type (e.g., industrial, retail, office), the floor plan, the building features (e.g., number of docks,  number of parking spots), the lease terms and the capital required, to name a few.  On this last point about capital, there were a lot of variations there too, in terms of financing the real estate, the tenant improvements, the lease securitization, the startup costs, etc.  And to make matters worse, there wasn’t a one-size fits all investor—some preferred real estate investing, some preferred venture investing the operating company, and some preferred lending debt secured by needed equipment.  Even if you found the right building, there was no guarantee it would come at terms you would be happy with or with financing partners that shared the enthusiasm for that location.

Some Screening Decisions Were Easy—Decisions Made By Us

For our business, having enough parking was pretty important.  If the property wasn’t at least 5 acres in size to enable parking for over 150 cars, that was largely a non-starter and could quickly cut those properties off the list.  If we really liked the location, maybe we could find a nearby satellite parking lot, but that meant we couldn’t do one without the other, adding a level of complexity to our search and discussions.  Other simple decisions could quickly be made to ensure the property had an entrepreneur-friendly landlord, affordable rent, large enough square footage, nearby highway access, etc.  The point here, the better you can screen these properties to the most important need, the less wasted time you would have.

Some Screening Decisions Were Easy—Decisions  Made By Them

Sometimes, a building would check all the right boxes for us, but we didn’t check all the right boxes for our landlord.  Maybe they didn’t like our co-warehousing model in their building.  Or their lending banks didn’t like having a startup as a tenant.  Or our financials were not as “pretty” as other larger companies.  Whatever the case may be, it is never fun to find a great building, to only get shot down by the other party.  So, ask those questions early in the process, to ensure you did not unnecessarily spin your wheels for no good reason.

Issues With The Landlord

Not all landlords are created equal.  Big institutionally owned buildings backed by big billion dollar banks were typically the hardest to work with.  Their asks of a tenant were pretty much the same regardless of their business size, making it much harder for a startup to secure a building with them.  But, on the other hand, even if you found an entrepreneur-friendly landlord, that doesn’t mean they will give you the best terms.  As an example, we had one such landlord trying to charge us 33% higher rent, because they knew we didn’t have a lot of negotiating power as a startup.  Just make sure whoever you decide to work with will do so in a win-win way, and will have your back in good times or in bad times.

Issues With the Investors

We have had a couple situations where we found an investor for the building, but something didn’t work well for them.  They liked to invest in Raleigh (not Greensboro, too far away).  They like to invest in industrial buildings (not the converted big-box retail site were looking at).  They won’t look at any building that had any rezoning risks.  We had one investor say we’ll fund the building you like, but we are going to need to you take this other less desirable building, as well, which didn’t work for us.  Or we needed to hit some operating metrics on our old buildings, before they would consider the new buildings.  Fund raising is never easy, but make sure you do your due diligence on them, the same time they are doing their due diligence on you.

Issues With the Building

There are a lot of moving pieces with the building itself.  Was the space all on one floor or not?  Were the ceilings high enough to support warehouse racking?  Was at least 10% of the building finished office space?  Was the building climate controlled?  How old were the HVAC and electrical systems?  How many docks did it have and were they high docks for semi-trailers, low docks for box trucks or drive-in docks for smaller vehicles?  Was the building nice looking and fit with our brand image?   You get the point each building had its own unique challenges.  Know which ones are deal killers or not.

Issues With the Lease Terms

There are a lot of moving pieces in a commercial lease.  The lease length, the rent price, the operating costs, the amount of free rent period, the amount of the tenant improvements, the securitization asks of the landlord (e.g., personal guarantees, letters of credit, security deposits).  They all needed to fit together, like a jigsaw puzzle to get both parties to the finish line.  Often times these were negotiated at the end, after you fell in love with a building.  I suggest negotiating these first, to not waste a lot of time, unnecessarily.

One Case Study Worth Calling Out—The Perfect Building at Less Than Perfect Terms

We had found the absolute perfect building at the absolute perfect location with the absolute perfect landlord.  But when their banks got involved, the terms of the deal became unfavorable to us.  They were asking for a very high letter of credit, that made it near impossible to move forward until we finished our fund raising efforts.  But they did their best to get creative, pulling way back on our tenant improvement requirements, which in turn lowered their letter of credit ask.  But in doing so, it meant we would not have enough office space to keep our clients and income statement happy.

We did everything we could to try and make this work.  But we didn’t want to risk an underperforming location at the same time we raising capital.  And we didn’t want to invest everything we had into this building, without leaving the business with enough cash cushion for a “rainy day”.  We decided to walk, as painful as it was, to ensure we didn’t put our business in a bind in the event things did not go perfectly to plan, which they rarely do.  We may not have walked a couple months from now, post our fundraising, but moving forward now dangerously felt like putting the “cart before the horse”.

Closing Thoughts

So, why did I share all these excruciating details about our site selection process?  To basically say three things: (1) know what the priority levers are in any business decision to save you from spinning your wheels on a lot of unnecessary work; (2) when you do find something that could work, quickly assess it to ensure the terms and partners are to your liking; and (3) never “force it”—if your gut is telling you moving forward would be a stretch for your business, walk away to live another day, no matter how much you like it.  I hope this helped you not only with your real estate related projects, but your general business decision making process, as well.


For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.




Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Sometimes a Business Needs an Uncomfortable Leap to Get It 'Unstuck'

Posted By: George Deeb - 10/14/2026

I have been working with a business that is basically “stuck” The business is doing OK, about break-even. But it is not growing and doesn’t ...


I have been working with a business that is basically “stuck” The business is doing OK, about break-even. But it is not growing and doesn’t have a current path to correct itself. That said, it has a great business opportunity in front of it, but investors do not want to fund the business, largely because the historical unit economics are not as profitable as the future unit economics projected, and that has investors feeling that it is a leap of faith farther than they are willing to jump.  They are looking at opening a new location, which will materially propel the business to new heights, maximizing revenues, profits and unit economics while proving it can successfully open a new market. The business needs $1 million to comfortably open this location but has only $500,000 to work with today. But sometimes a business has no choice but to take a big risk to get it “unstuck.”

Read the rest of this post in Entrepreneur, which I guest authored this week.

For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.



Monday, October 5, 2026

[VIDEO] The 6 Traits VC's Are Looking for in CEOs

Posted By: George Deeb - 10/05/2026

I was recently interviewed by ASBN , an online "television network" serving the small business community, about what traits ventur...


I was recently interviewed by ASBN, an online "television network" serving the small business community, about what traits venture capitalists are looking for in CEOs that they back.  This video will help you assess your own skillsets, to see if you have what it takes to attract investors.  I thought this video turned out great, and I wanted to share it with all of you. I hope you like it!!



The embedded video player didn't give me the option to change the size of this video.  But, if you want to see a bigger version, simply click the expand size button in the player above.

Thanks again to Jim Fitzpatrick and the ASBN team for having me on the show.  I look forward to our next interview together.

For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.


[VIDEO] Can't Raise Venture Capital? Try Raising Private Equity Instead!

Posted By: George Deeb - 10/05/2026

  I was recently interviewed by ASBN, an online "television network" serving the small business community, about how to raise capi...

 


I was recently interviewed by ASBN, an online "television network" serving the small business community, about how to raise capital from alternative sources if you are having trouble raising venture capital.  This presented the idea of buying a larger company producing cash-flow through private equity, to enable growth through new ways.  I thought this video turned out great, and I wanted to share it with all of you. I hope you like it!!




The embedded video player didn't give me the option to change the size of this video.  But, if you want to see a bigger version, simply click the expand size button in the player above.

Thanks again to Jim Fitzpatrick and the ASBN team for having me on the show.  I look forward to our next interview together.

For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.



Lesson #384: Think 10 Steps Ahead--Living in The Present Can Hurt You Long Term

Posted By: George Deeb - 10/05/2026

  All entrepreneurs have lived through a cash squeeze at some point in their history.  There is nothing worse than worrying about if you wil...

 


All entrepreneurs have lived through a cash squeeze at some point in their history.  There is nothing worse than worrying about if you will be able to fund your next payroll or can stay liquid enough to survive another day.  That fear of running out of money can cause you to become desperate, willing to take cash from whoever happens to show up to save the day.  But sometimes taking that cash can have unintended consequences, that had you thought about its longer-term impact, you may never have taken that cash in hindsight.  This case study will help teach you how not to make this same mistake in your business.

A Case Study—Living in The Present

I met a retailer that had a chain of boutique jewelry stores.  They preferred to locate their stores in affluent suburban areas of highly populated metropolitan markets.  They started to experience a downturn in the sales when consumer spending started to slow, which created a cash squeeze on their business.  With no excess cash in the bank, they needed to quickly find an investor to save their business.

Luckily, they did find an investor that was willing to infuse the much needed capital into their business.  But that cash came with strings attached.  The investor was a fan of the store, and wanted a new location opened up closer to where she lived.  The problem for the company was the investor lived about 30 miles outside of the city center, in a less affluent, more rural community.  The entrepreneur was very skeptical a new store in that location would be successful, but she was desperate for the cash, and she made an exception to her new site location strategy to close the investment deal.

The good news is the company’s bank account saw the much needed cash infusion which allowed it to live on and fight another day.  The bad news is, when the new store opened in the investors’ home town a year later, it was doomed to fail before it even opened.  There simply wasn’t enough affluent people in the area that were interested in high-end jewelry.  After investing half of the funds raised into this new location, and losing a year of time getting the new store off the ground, the company decided it needed to close the location after about three months of it being open.  That put the company right back in the same situation it was a year earlier, in a cash squeeze with nothing to show for it.

But this time it was worse.  When she approached investors this second time around, she now had the egg on her face of having to explain why their newest store opening was a failure and needed to close so quickly after it opened.  The new investors started to question her expertise in finding good site locations, which had them questioning all the new store opening assumptions in her growth plan.  And what do most investors do when they have newfound uncertainty in a business plan . . . they typically do nothing, which is exactly what happened here.  The company was unable to raise the capital needed the second time, and was forced to take the company out of business entirely.  What a mess!

The Same Case Study—Living in The Future

If this entrepreneur had been thinking in the future, not the present, and was willing to stick to her defined strategy for new site locations, this business could have survived.  She should have told the first investor her rationale for why she did not want to open a location in a “non-prime” market.  That investor would have had more respect for her, demonstrating the clear discipline she had in running a successful chain of stores.  Maybe that investor would have walked, but that is perfectly okay.  You simply find a new investor that won’t make you run through unnecessary hoops that your own gut instinct would have told you was a bad decision.

Part of the point here is that all cash is not the same shade of green.  Cash that comes with strings attached that knowingly hurts your business is not cash at all, it is potentially a precursor to a death sentence, as it was in this case.

Closing Thoughts

Running a business is like playing chess; you always need to be thinking ten steps ahead.  Because if you don’t, and you succumb to the needs of putting out a short-term fire, you may end up tying a noose around your neck in the process, and didn’t even know it at the time.  Every action has a consequence, some of them are good, and some of them are bad.  Just be smart enough to see “the forest through the trees”, planning far enough ahead, to make sure you are not sparking an unintended wildfire.


For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.



Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Never Sacrifice Your Priorities When Making Decisions

Posted By: George Deeb - 8/18/2026

I have recently been looking for new site locations for my co-warehousing business, Blue Co .  What an eye-opening experience that has been ...


I have recently been looking for new site locations for my co-warehousing business, Blue Co.  What an eye-opening experience that has been over the last couple of months, rife with ups and downs and business lessons for all. The short story is: as a startup, you only have a few opportunities to open a new location, and you have to get it right to impress your investors. No opportunity is perfect, and you may need to make some sacrifices. But knowing what elements are non-negotiable could be the difference between keeping your business growing and potentially “sinking the ship.” Allow me to explain.

Read the rest of this post in Entrepreneur, which I guest authored this week.

For future posts, please follow me on Twitter at: @georgedeeb.



Strategy

General Business

Marketing

Sales

Fund Raising

Red Rocket is a featured contributor on entrepreneurship for many trusted business sites:

Copyright 2011- Red Rocket Partners, LLC